 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| n |
One of most
remarkable organizations, processes, and
|
|
|
development
cultures seen in AT&T Bell Laboratories Pasteur
|
|
|
process research
project
|
|
| n |
Project
management, product management, QA integral to team,
|
|
|
all making
technical contributions
|
|
| n |
Higher
communication saturation than 89% of projects
|
|
| n |
More even
distribution of workload
|
|
| n |
“Anti-schismogenetic”
– no cliques
|
|
| n |
Highly iterative
development
|
|
| n |
Strong
architectural interaction with implementation
|
|
| n |
More time spent
in project team meetings than anything else –
|
|
|
several hours a
day
|
|
| n |
Gerry Weinberg
notes that CMM Level 1 and 2 teams need strong
|
|
managerial
direction. Level 3 paradigm shift is self-directing team.
|
|
|
Borland team was
clearly in this category, although not by
|
|
|
commonly accepted
criteria.
|
|